Congress Navigator

Strategic intelligence

Ask a strategic KIQ

Explore whether the congress evidence helps answer a broader strategic intelligence question that reaches beyond the predefined KBQ framework.

KBQ — a congress-specific analytical question defined before the congress.

KIQ — a broader strategic intelligence question that congress evidence may help to inform.

Illustrative synthetic data for prototype demonstration — not real clinical findings.

9

Evidence availability

Relevant evidence found in 9 of 16 HCP conversations.

Answer

The congress evidence suggests HCP thinking about post-CDK4/6 sequencing is actively evolving rather than settled. A change of mechanism after progression is now the dominant instinct, but decisions are increasingly framed as individualised and informed by molecular findings and the interval to recurrence.

What the evidence suggests

  • A switch in mechanism of action is the default reasoning after progression on the class, expressed by the majority of relevant HCPs.
  • Molecular profiling and ctDNA are moving from research interest towards a practical role in the next-line decision.
  • A meaningful minority continue to individualise, keeping re-challenge or continuation with modification on the table in selected late-recurrence cases.

Important caveats

  • The sample is small (n=16) and drawn from a single congress; findings are directional, not statistically representative.
  • Sequencing views were not equally elaborated by every HCP — 9 of 16 conversations contained substantive evidence.
  • Stated approaches may not fully reflect real-world prescribing under access and reimbursement constraints.

Supporting evidence

HCP 04

Medical Oncologist · Germany

“Progression on the class tells me the mechanism is exhausted — I switch rather than persist.”
HCP profile

HCP 09

Medical Oncologist · United States

“Increasingly I am letting the molecular findings and ctDNA dynamics guide what I choose next.”
HCP profile

HCP 13

Medical Oncologist · United States

“In selected late recurrences I would still consider continuing the class with modification.”
HCP profile

Adjacent questions

The available evidence could also help explore these. Select one to rerun the analysis.