Congress Navigator

Beyond the framework

Discoveries

Things we were not explicitly looking for — unexpected observations, newly raised issues and emerging patterns that surfaced in the conversations outside the predefined KBQ and KIQ framework. Presented as additional observations, not established trends.

Illustrative synthetic data for prototype demonstration — not real clinical findings.

Discovery · not an explicit KBQ or KIQ

Financial toxicity and access constraints

Several conversations touched on affordability, reimbursement and access as factors that shape what clinicians can realistically offer, independent of the clinical data — a topic none of the predefined questions asked about.

7

of 16 conversations

Why it may matter

Access considerations may moderate the real-world uptake implied by the clinical enthusiasm seen in the KBQ analysis.

Discovery · not an explicit KBQ or KIQ

Quality of life as a decision driver

Patient-reported outcomes and day-to-day functioning were raised repeatedly, unprompted, as increasingly central to treatment decisions in this setting.

9

of 16 conversations

Why it may matter

Quality-of-life framing appears influential across questions and may be underweighted relative to efficacy endpoints in current materials.

Discovery · not an explicit KBQ or KIQ

Interest in biomarker- and ctDNA-guided selection

A number of experts spontaneously referenced molecular profiling and ctDNA as an emerging lens for selecting and sequencing therapy.

6

of 16 conversations

Why it may matter

Biomarker-guided reasoning may become a key frame for future positioning and warrants monitoring.

Discovery · not an explicit KBQ or KIQ

Fatigue with cross-trial comparison

Some clinicians expressed unprompted frustration at being asked to compare treatments across trials with differing populations and designs.

5

of 16 conversations

Why it may matter

A desire for fair, like-for-like comparison could shape how comparative messaging is received.

Discovery · not an explicit KBQ or KIQ

Role of the multidisciplinary team in adoption

Decisions were frequently described as team-based, with the MDT influencing whether and how a new option is taken up — a dynamic not captured by the KBQs.

8

of 16 conversations

Why it may matter

Adoption may depend on MDT-level acceptance rather than individual prescriber preference alone.

Discovery · not an explicit KBQ or KIQ

Trial versus real-world population mismatch

Concern that trial populations are healthier and more selected than the patients seen in routine practice recurred across conversations without being asked.

7

of 16 conversations

Why it may matter

Perceived generalisability gaps could temper how readily trial results translate into practice.