Congress Navigator
All HCPs
02

HCP 02

Medical Oncologist · France · Department head

Illustrative synthetic data for prototype demonstration — not real clinical findings.

Discussion summary

Weighs quality-of-life and tolerability heavily; supportive but wants durability data before changing practice.

Key themes

Quality of lifeDurability of benefit

Pre / post perception

Overall perception shift

Pre-congress vs post-congress

5 improved

Perception of clinical efficacy

Neutral
Positive
+1

Confidence in the evidence

Positive
Very positive
+1

Safety / tolerability perception

Low
Low
0

Likelihood to prescribe

Neutral
Positive
+1

Familiarity with treatment

Positive
Very positive
+1

Competitive perception

Low
Positive
+2

Illustrative synthetic measures. Movement is shown as an observed pre/post shift, not a causal effect of the congress.

KBQs discussed

Position against each predefined question

Clinical significance of the primary endpoint

What is the expert consensus regarding the clinical significance of the study’s primary endpoint results?

Supportive
“This is a setting where we badly need options, and this endpoint really moves the needle for me.”
See aggregated KBQ finding

Safety, tolerability and willingness to prescribe

How do HCP perceptions of the trial’s safety and tolerability profile impact their willingness to adopt and prescribe the treatment?

Conditional willingness
“I would prescribe it, provided we have a realistic monitoring pathway in place.”
See aggregated KBQ finding

Use in node-positive populations

What is the clinical consensus among HCPs regarding the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in node-positive patient populations?

Favourable
“The absolute benefit in this group is enough to justify the exposure for me.”
See aggregated KBQ finding

Sequencing after adjuvant recurrence

How do clinicians approach treatment sequencing following recurrence on an adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor?

Individualised
“It depends on the interval — a late recurrence is a very different conversation from an early one.”
See aggregated KBQ finding

Compelling nature of the primary endpoint

How compelling are the primary endpoint findings in driving prospective prescribers to select this treatment over existing options?

Compelling
“The effect relative to the comparators is enough to make this my first choice.”
See aggregated KBQ finding

Perception of safety and tolerability

How do experts perceive the safety and tolerability profile demonstrated in the trial?

Acceptable with monitoring
“It is acceptable, as long as routine monitoring is feasible in the clinic.”
See aggregated KBQ finding